108 posts · 54,676 views
a gateway to journal articles, research papers, books, websites and other resources in Supply Chain Risk and Business Continuity, personally collected and in-depth reviewed by Jan Husdal, a researcher, consultant, PhD-student and academic in spe from Norway.
Jan Husdal
108 posts
Sort by: Latest Post, Most Popular
View by: Condensed, Full
by Jan Husdal in Supply Chain Risk Research & Literature Review
The article lists and discusses eight risk definitions, and then suggests an alternative and comprehensive definition that captures all aspects of [ ... ]... Read more »
Aven, T. (2010) On how to define, understand and describe risk. Reliability Engineering , 95(6), 623-631. DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.01.011
by Jan Husdal in Supply Chain Risk Research & Literature Review
“Publish or perish“. You’ve heard the phrase, right? Well, apparently, getting published in the first place is not as easy as it seems, and the peer-review process may not as objective and unbiased as you may think. If you’re in (as in belonging to the right academic circles, and thus worthy of being published), you’re [...]... Read more »
Gibson, B., Hanna, J., & Menachof, D. (2004) Periodical usefulness: an international perspective. International Journal of Logistics, 7(3), 297-311. DOI: 10.1080/13675560412331298482
Macdonald, S., & Kam, J. (2007) Ring a Ring o? Roses: Quality Journals and Gamesmanship in Management Studies. Journal of Management Studies, 44(4), 640-655. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00704.x
by Jan Husdal in Supply Chain Risk Research & Literature Review
A year ago or so I was perusing the Internet for scholarly or academic blogs, which I found, commented on and then forgot about. Today I stumbled upon an old comment that is a poignant reminder of my post on the Catch 22 of Academic Publishing. It was my comment on the post The Paradox [...]... Read more »
Evans, J. (2008) Electronic Publication and the Narrowing of Science and Scholarship. Science, 321(5887), 395-399. DOI: 10.1126/science.1150473
by Jan Husdal in Supply Chain Risk Research & Literature Review
A study published in the May 2009 issue of College & Research Libraries investigates how Google Scholar compares to library databases. As it turns out, Google Scholar is on average 17.6 percent more scholarly than materials found only in library databases. D’oh! So should you switch to Google Scholar?... Read more »
Jared L. Howland, Thomas C. Wright, Rebecca A. Boughan, & Brian C. Roberts. (2009) How Scholarly Is Google Scholar? A Comparison to Library Databases. College and Research Libraries, 70(3). DOI: http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/crljournal/2009/may/index.cfm
by Jan Husdal in Supply Chain Risk Research & Literature Review
Do you write academic papers? Do you really check and actually read your references before citing them? Every now and then I run a search on citation databases, e.g. Scopus, to see if someone has used my published or online work, and today something interesting turned up: my supposed PhD dissertation, cited in two separate and seemingly unrelated papers. While I appreciate the honor of being credited with a PhD, fact is, I don’t have a PhD…yet…so obviously someone did not do their homework........ Read more »
Wasi, S. R., & Bender, J. D. (2004) Spatially Enabled Pipeline Route Optimization Model. Prpceeding of the 2004 International Pipeline Conference (IPC2004) , 699-707. DOI: 10.1115/IPC2004-0362
by Jan Husdal in Supply Chain Risk Research & Literature Review
Locating a right-of-way for a linear facility such as a pipeline, a transmission line, a railway or a roadway can be a complex problem. Before computers invaded the field of spatial analysis, McHarg (1967) wrote one of the pioneering articles in corridor analysis. ... Read more »
CHURCH, R., LOBAN, S., & LOMBARD, K. (1992) An interface for exploring spatial alternatives for a corridor location problem. Computers , 18(8), 1095-1105. DOI: 10.1016/0098-3004(92)90023-K
Collischonn, W., & Pilar, J. (2000) A direction dependent least-cost-path algorithm for roads and canals. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14(4), 397-406. DOI: 10.1080/13658810050024304
Cova, T. (2000) Exploratory spatial optimization in site search: a neighborhood operator approach. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24(5), 401-419. DOI: 10.1016/S0198-9715(00)00015-6
Cova, T., & Goodchild, M. (2002) Extending geographical representation to include fields of spatial objects. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16(6), 509-532. DOI: 10.1080/13658810210137040
Deo, N., & Pang, C. (1984) Shortest-path algorithms: Taxonomy and annotation. Networks, 14(2), 275-323. DOI: 10.1002/net.3230140208
Dijkstra, E. (1959) A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1(1), 269-271. DOI: 10.1007/BF01386390
DOUGLAS, D. (1994) Least-cost Path in GIS Using an Accumulated Cost Surface and Slopelines. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 31(3), 37-51. DOI: 10.3138/D327-0323-2JUT-016M
Dreyfus, S. (1969) An Appraisal of Some Shortest-Path Algorithms. Operations Research, 17(3), 395-412. DOI: 10.1287/opre.17.3.395
Huber, D., & Church, R. (1985) Transmission Corridor Location Modeling. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 111(2), 114. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1985)111:2(114)
Xu, J., & Lathrop, R. (1995) Improving simulation accuracy of spread phenomena in a raster-based Geographic Information System. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 9(2), 153-168. DOI: 10.1080/02693799508902031
by Jan Husdal in Supply Chain Risk Research & Literature Review
Few will question that the sender, the recipient, the freight hauler or society in general, experience additional costs when goods or persons cannot reach their destinations in time or space.Why then, is the reliability, or conversely, the vulnerability, of the transportation network not a matter of evaluation in traditional cost-benefit analyses?... Read more »
Berdica, K. (2002) An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done. Transport Policy, 9(2), 117-127. DOI: 10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00011-2
by Jan Husdal in Supply Chain Risk Research & Literature Review
Should short-term loss-minimization and short-term profit maximization really be the driving force behind supply chain risk management? In their 2009 article Weak links in the supply chain: measuring fragility and sustainability, Stonebraker, Goldhar and Nassos point at a emerging area of supply chain research: fragility and sustainability, and they develop a framework for understanding and [...]... Read more »
Stonebraker, P., Goldhar, J., & Nassos, G. (2009) Weak links in the supply chain: measuring fragility and sustainability. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(2), 161-177. DOI: 10.1108/17410380910929600
by Jan Husdal in Supply Chain Risk Research & Literature Review
Supply Chain Management (SCM) has evolved into both a professional and an academic field that is growing, spreading and developing offshoots in all directions. But what is SCM really, is it just a new name for logistics or is it possible to distinguish certain perspectives? And what is the difference between the Tradionalist, the Unionist, the Re-Labelist, and the Intersectionist? ... Read more »
Halldorsson, A., & Larson, P. (2004) Logistics versus supply chain management: an international survey. International Journal of Logistics, 7(1), 17-31. DOI: 10.1080/13675560310001619240
by Jan Husdal in Supply Chain Risk Research & Literature Review
The risk management literature separates between mitigative actions or strategies and contingent actions and strategies. It is important to keep these two perspectives apart. Why? Because risk management needs to address both sides of the risk: what lies behind the risk (source) and what lies in front of it (consequences). Here is my attempt at [...]... Read more »
Bjørn Egil Asbjørnslett. (2008) Assessing the Vulnerability of Supply Chains . International Series in Operations Research , 15-33. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-79934-6_2
Jüttner, U., Peck, H., & Christopher, M. (2003) Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research. International Journal of Logistics, 6(4), 197-210. DOI: 10.1080/13675560310001627016
Tomlin, B. (2006) On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks. Management Science, 52(5), 639-657. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0515
by Jan Husdal in Supply Chain Risk Research & Literature Review
‘All firms are snakes’. So says Paul D. Cousins in A conceptual model for managing long-term inter-organisational relationships, published in 2002. ‘They are maximisers and satisfiers concerned with their own survival and self-interest’. I find that a rather harsh statement. How are collaboration and relationship management possible in such an environment? Do we really need to cooperate anyway?... Read more »
COUSINS, P. (2002) A conceptual model for managing long-term inter-organisational relationships. European Journal of Purchasing , 8(2), 71-82. DOI: 10.1016/S0969-7012(01)00006-5
by Jan Husdal in Supply Chain Risk Research & Literature Review
Is it possible to summarize seven years of supply chain risk management research and find a common theme or definition of what supply chain risk is all about? Apparently not. In Supply chain risk management: literature review and future research, Vanany, Zailani and Pujawan, three scholars from Indonesia and Malaysia, review and classify 82 articles in what is the most complete review that I have seen to date. But…is it a helpful review?... Read more »
Vanany, Iwan, Zailani, Suhaiza, & Pujawan, Nyoman. (2009) Supply chain risk management: literature review and future research. International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management, 2(1), 16-33. DOI: http://www.igi-global.com/articles/details.asp?ID
by Jan Husdal in Supply Chain Risk Research & Literature Review
Classic risk management literature acknowledges four ways of dealing with risk after establishing a risk matrix: Avoid, Reduce, Transfer and Retain or Accept. However, as it turns out, there are six ways, not just four ways to deal with risk ,as the classic risk matrix indicates. Two more are Exploit and Ignore. The former stems [...]... Read more »
Tomlin, B. (2006) On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks. Management Science, 52(5), 639-657. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0515
by Jan Husdal in Supply Chain Risk Research & Literature Review
What is at the forefront of current research in supply chain management and logistics right now? I know, thanks to to Gyöngi Kovács at interorganisational.org, who attended the NOFOMA 2009 conference, where Emerald, one of the world's leading publishers of management journals, presented some statistics on which articles that were most downloaded from their online journals during the first quarter of 2009.... Read more »
Pålsson, H., & Johansson, O. (2009) Supply chain integration obtained through uniquely labelled goods: A survey of Swedish manufacturing industries. International Journal of Physical Distribution , 39(1), 28-46. DOI: 10.1108/09600030910929174
Christopher, M., & Lee, H. (2004) Mitigating supply chain risk through improved confidence. International Journal of Physical Distribution , 34(5), 388-396. DOI: 10.1108/09600030410545436
Hanafi, J., Kara, S., & Kaebernick, H. (2008) Reverse logistics strategies for end-of-life products. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 19(3), 367-388. DOI: 10.1108/09574090810919206
Masson, R., Iosif, L., MacKerron, G., & Fernie, J. (2007) Managing complexity in agile global fashion industry supply chains. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 18(2), 238-254. DOI: 10.1108/09574090710816959
Cho, J., Ozment, J., & Sink, H. (2008) Logistics capability, logistics outsourcing and firm performance in an e-commerce market. International Journal of Physical Distribution , 38(5), 336-359. DOI: 10.1108/09600030810882825
Spekman, R., & II, P. (2006) RFID: from concept to implementation. International Journal of Physical Distribution , 36(10), 736-754. DOI: 10.1108/09600030610714571
by Jan Husdal in Supply Chain Risk Research & Literature Review
Transport network vulnerability is a relatively new field of research and to this date no commonly agreed definition or quantifiable expression of what vulnerability is exists within the academic community.... Read more »
JENELIUS, E., PETERSEN, T., & MATTSSON, L. (2006) Importance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(7), 537-560. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2005.11.003
by Jan Husdal in Supply Chain Risk Research & Literature Review
Am I missing something here? Does Supply Risk Management come down to plain and simple common sense? I don’t mind authors who use propositions in their articles; it usually shows that they have a pretty good grip on their subject. But here...not only are the propositions not fully exploited, they appear to be little more than basic common sense, or is it me who is way off?... Read more »
Giunipero, L., & Eltantawy, R. (2004) Securing the upstream supply chain: a risk management approach. International Journal of Physical Distribution , 34(9), 698-713. DOI: 10.1108/09600030410567478
by Jan Husdal in Supply Chain Risk Research & Literature Review
It is practically impossible to write a paper on supply chain risk without citing Risk in supply networks by Harland, Brenchley & Walker (2003). Why? Because it delivers a holistic take on risk, risk management and supply chains, and an excellent discourse on types of risk, sources of risks and descriptions of risk.... Read more »
Harland, C. (2003) Risk in supply networks. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9(2), 51-62. DOI: 10.1016/S1478-4092(03)00004-9
by Jan Husdal in Supply Chain Risk Research & Literature Review
Looking up new articles from reference lists can be amazing discoveries, and it’s so interesting to note how one thing leads to the other…especially when you’re doing literature reviews…and usually it’s like this: You are reading some article on your main subject when you see some interesting references, which you look up, just to find [...]... Read more »
Polito, T., & Watson, K. (2006) Just-in-Time Under Fire: The Five Major Constraints Upon JIT Practices. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 9(1), 8-13. DOI: http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did
WATSON, K., BLACKSTONE, J., & GARDINER, S. (2007) The evolution of a management philosophy: The theory of constraints. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 387-402. DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2006.04.004
by Jan Husdal in Supply Chain Risk Research & Literature Review
Sometimes the most interesting articles are found outside the mainstream journals of ones field, and so it is with Cheng and Kam (2008) A conceptual framework for analyzing risk in supply networks, found in the Journal of Enterprise Information Management, a very unlikely journal for finding a paper on supply chain risk. It is not [...]... Read more »
Cheng, S., & Kam, B. (2008) A conceptual framework for analysing risk in supply networks. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 21(4), 345-360. DOI: 10.1108/17410390810888642
by Jan Husdal in Supply Chain Risk Research & Literature Review
Opposites attract and in the supply chain world, “lean” and “agile” appear to be opposites. Both management strategies have their advantages and disadvantages, and the question is, is it possible for them to exist side by side, or even fuse? In their 2006 article A taxonomy for selecting global supply chain strategies, Christopher, Peck and [...]... Read more »
Christopher, M., Peck, H., & Towill, D. (2006) A taxonomy for selecting global supply chain strategies. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 17(2), 277-287. DOI: 10.1108/09574090610689998
Christopher, M., & R.Towill, D. (2002) Developing Market Specific Supply Chain Strategies. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 13(1), 1-14. DOI: 10.1108/09574090210806324
Mason-Jones, R., Naylor, B., & Towill, D. (2000) Engineering the leagile supply chain. International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 2(1), 54-61. DOI: 10.1108/14654650010312606
Ben Naylor, J. (1999) Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1-2), 107-118. DOI: 10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00223-0
Do you write about peer-reviewed research in your blog? Use ResearchBlogging.org to make it easy for your readers — and others from around the world — to find your serious posts about academic research.
If you don't have a blog, you can still use our site to learn about fascinating developments in cutting-edge research from around the world.