The BPR3 Icon Contest

Administration 25 Comments
By Dave Munger

Bloggers for Peer-Reviewed Research Reporting is pleased to announce its contest for designing the icon that will represent the organization and its mission on academic blogs world-wide.

Contest participants will design a universal icon that everyone can use on their blog posts whenever the post is a serious commentary about a paper published in a peer-reviewed journal, and not just a link to a press release or media commentary.

Eventually these posts will be collected on BPR3.org, so anyone can find the most thoughtful blog posts on the internet, discussing serious research, not just media hype.

The contest will run from Friday, August 24 to Monday, September 10. The top three submissions will be selected by BPR3, then the final icon will be chosen by readers’ vote.

Contest Guidelines

  • Icon must be a standard .GIF or .JPG image
  • Entries must be submitted in three sizes: 120(w) X 90(h), 80 X 50, and 16 X 16 (each size icon may be different, but should maintain a common theme)
  • All entries must be exactly the height specified, but the two largest-sized icons may be narrower, but no wider than specified (e.g. a 110 X 90 icon would be acceptable for the largest size, but a 120 X 85 icon would not). The smallest icon must be exactly 16 X 16.

In addition, successful entries will be

  • Easy to use
  • Recognizable
  • Representative of the aims of the BPR3 organization (see “What the icon will signify” below)
  • Low-bandwidth
  • Compatible with many different site designs
  • Attractive
  • Copyright-free [e.g. use no copyrighted images]

What the icon will signify

  • The BPR3 icon will represent, most importantly, a blog post that thoughtfully discusses peer-reviewed research.
  • All research should be formally cited according to the requirements of the discipline within which it falls, and linked when possible.
  • The post should make it clear when it is discussing research or ideas that are not peer reviewed.
  • The poster should have carefully read all research cited.
  • The icon should link back to the BPR3.org site in the manner we specify (this will depend on the method we choose for aggregating posts).

Submission Guidelines

  • Submit entries by posting links to the icons (or a blog post containing the icons) on the Contest Thread at http://researchblogging.org/news/?p=18
  • Only entries with valid email addresses will be considered (email addresses will not be published)
  • You may also email your submission to Dave Munger (remove dashes!)
  • Winning entrants must be willing to turn over all copyright to bpr3.org and / or place the copyright in the public domain as specified by bpr3.org
  • Note: preserve all files / layers / fonts you used to make the submission. You’ll need to provide those materials if your submission is chosen.

Prizes
In addition to the admiration and respect of the entire academic blogosphere, the winning entrant will earn

BPR3 is currently working with other publishers about the possibility of additional prizes, so stay tuned!

About BPR3
Bloggers for Peer-Reviewed Research Reporting strives to identify serious academic blog posts about peer-reviewed research by developing an icon and an aggregation site where others can look to find the best academic blogging on the Net.

Note: Bloggers and media organizations are free to reproduce this announcement in its entirety. We look forward to seeing your submissions!

25 Responses to “The BPR3 Icon Contest”

  1. Bloggers for Peer-Reviewed Research Reporting [A Blog Around The Clock] · New York Articles Says:
    August 24th, 2007 at 8:08 am

    [...] announced that the contest for the icon for denoting posts covering peer-reviewed research is now open. Use your creative skills and/or spread the [...]

  2. Jeff Hunt Says:
    August 24th, 2007 at 10:37 am

    Entries are Displayed in 90×90, 50×50 and 16×16 format.

  3. Stephen Downes Says:
    August 24th, 2007 at 10:56 am

    How about an icon with a great big lock and chain on it? Because most peer reviewed research is still published in closed journals and so the reader cannot check whether the blogger correctly interpreted the article or is just making stuff up.

    On a more general note, I appreciate that the intent is to highlight reportage that is about something other than press releases and news clippings, but I think that the realm of credible work extends well beyond that described in peer reviewed research.

  4. Distributed Neuron » The BPR3 Icon Contest Says:
    August 24th, 2007 at 11:27 am

    [...] for Peer-Reviewed Research Reporting is now hosting a contest for their icon. Winners of the contest receive free subscription to Seed Magazine, a ScienceBlogs coffee mug, and [...]

  5. dave munger Says:
    August 24th, 2007 at 12:00 pm

    Stephen–

    You bring up two very good points.

    The inaccessibility of peer-reviewed research is a serious problem, but I think our initiative could actually help open things up. When people see that the article being blogged about is locked up, they may begin to wonder why research that’s often taxpayer funded isn’t freely available. While I’m not sure a padlock is the best way of expressing BPR3’s goals, it might be possible to include a small padlock as part of the icon, in cases when an article is subscription-only. The padlock-free icon could be used for open access journals like PLOS and Journal of Vision.

    Regarding your second point, it’s true that some valuable research is not peer-reviewed. Maybe some other organization could be formed to highlight this material. However, I think the organizers will find it quite difficult to come up with a way to distinguish good research from the products of crackpots that doesn’t look a lot like peer review.

  6. dave munger Says:
    August 24th, 2007 at 12:23 pm

    You know, I’ve been thinking a bit more about the “grey literature” points that have been brought up, most recently by Stephen. How do you identify thoughtful work that happens not to have gone through peer review — without actually reviewing it?

    Well, one thing you could do is to find work that cites work in peer-reviewed journals. That, in effect, is what BPR3 is all about. If you think about it that way, far from marginalizing grey literature, BPR3 is in fact placing it front and center.

    Obviously that doesn’t cover all types of grey literature, but it’s certainly a start.

    I’d be less comfortable allowing work that cites only grey literature and no peer reviewed literature to be a part of BPR3. That strikes me as much more likely to be problematic.

  7. matthew Says:
    August 24th, 2007 at 2:26 pm

    So, it is supposed to be the exact same image for all 3 image sizes, correct? 16×16 really limits how creative you can get…

  8. Dave Munger Says:
    August 24th, 2007 at 3:38 pm

    No, not the exact same image for all three sizes. Each image should have a similar theme, but the idea is that the critical elements are retained for the smaller versions.

    As an example, look at Scienceblogs:

    On Cognitive Daily, the icon is one size (upper right corner).
    Then on the Last 24 hours page it’s bigger (upper left).
    The favicon (16×16) is in the location box of your browser, and only includes the letters Sb.

    I’m imagining that the larger icons will say something like “Peer Review” in addition to having the BPR3.org address. The small one might just have a picture from the larger icon, without any letters. For example when you look at the samples on this thread, the small icon might just be the magnifying glass.

    [I've now edited the original guidelines to reflect this information]

  9. matthew Says:
    August 24th, 2007 at 3:52 pm

    Excellent. Thank you.

  10. More prizes for the BPR3 icon contest! | BPR3 Says:
    August 29th, 2007 at 7:34 am

    [...] Help design the icon that bloggers will use to identify peer-reviewed research and win subscriptions to Nature, Seed, and more! Contest Details [...]

  11. matthew Says:
    August 29th, 2007 at 8:30 pm

    Here is my official entry:

    http://badsushi.net/bpr3.jpg

  12. Dave Munger Says:
    August 30th, 2007 at 7:11 am

    Here’s a question:

    I have some comments on the entries so far, but I’m not sure if it’s a good idea for me to express them right now, given the “contest” nature of this project. What do other readers think? Should we comment on entries as they come in? Or should we hold off on commentary for the sake of the integrity of the contest.

    In my view, it’s important to come up with the best icon possible, so if readers have suggestions, it should be fine for them to be offered, and for contestants to modify their entries over the period of the contest.

  13. Kevin Z Says:
    August 30th, 2007 at 11:10 am

    Is this where I submit my entry? I posted it on my blog (click here). These are my official entries.

    I think you and the other judges should not comment on any entries until the end of the contest because you might influence the outcome. Other people not associated with judging should though.

    Are entries allowed to be modified once posted, in response to comments?

  14. Dave Munger Says:
    August 31st, 2007 at 5:40 am

    Yes, this is where you submit! I think entries should be allowed to be modified in response to comments. After all, the point is to get the best possible entries, and the best icon for BPR3. I can, however, understand the idea of not wanting the judges’ commentary to influence the outcome.

  15. Emile Petrone Says:
    September 4th, 2007 at 8:28 am

    Here are my entries! The sizes may be off in the post, but the images are the correct size in Illustrator. I can send those files if necessary!
    Cheers,
    Emile

    http://www.knowble.net/blog/archives/48

  16. nojhan Says:
    September 5th, 2007 at 2:51 pm

    Here are my propositions:

  17. nojhan Says:
    September 5th, 2007 at 2:54 pm

    Here is my proposition:
    http://www.nojhan.net/art/sources/bpr3_nojhan_1_14.png
    http://www.nojhan.net/art/sources/bpr3_nojhan_1_28.png
    http://www.nojhan.net/art/sources/bpr3_nojhan_1_32.png

    The inspiration comes from the RSS feed icon, which is related to blogs on the web. The icon represent a magnifying glass with “communication waves”.

  18. Even more prizes for the icon design contest | BPR3 Says:
    September 6th, 2007 at 8:44 am

    [...] Help design the icon that bloggers will use to identify peer-reviewed research and win subscriptions to Nature, Seed, and more! Contest Details [...]

  19. Stephen Downes Says:
    September 7th, 2007 at 8:06 am

    I like nojhan’s. But I think the icon should be red for locked sources, and green for open sources.

  20. Eric L Says:
    September 7th, 2007 at 12:39 pm

    And another entry…

    Small (16×16)
    Medium(80×50)
    Large(120×90)

    Those are .gifs, but I also have them in .png (and could do a .jpg, though I was not as happy with that export as with the .gif)

  21. Roeland Hancock Says:
    September 7th, 2007 at 11:06 pm

    Here’s my entry
    BPR3 Icons

  22. Uriel Klieger Says:
    September 9th, 2007 at 10:18 am

    Here’s a link to my entries:
    Small
    Medium
    Large

    I’m sure you’ll never guess the source file for the blurry text in the image, but I think everyone here will appreciate the humor…

  23. Vlad Says:
    September 9th, 2007 at 1:30 pm

    Nice competition.

  24. matthew Says:
    September 10th, 2007 at 1:37 pm

    Here is another entry of mine:

    http://badsushi.net/bpr3_2.jpg

  25. nojhan Says:
    September 11th, 2007 at 3:45 am

    I forgot to precise that my icon is in the SVG format, thus permitting a use at any scale.

    See for example the 64px size :
    http://www.nojhan.net/art/sources/bpr3_nojhan_1_64.png

Leave a Reply

Icons by N.Design Studio. Based on a theme by Ben Swift.
Entries RSS Comments RSS Log in