Post List

Other posts

(Modify Search »)

  • June 22, 2009
  • 09:01 AM
  • 1,133 views

Not so widespread butterflies

by Scott A. in JournOwl

Honey bees, birds, bats and insects play a vital role in the pollination of the majority of fruits and vegetables. According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, more than 75% of flowering plants rely on animals for pollination. Over the last 10 years the U.S. Department of Agriculture has referred to the declining populations of [...]... Read more »

  • June 22, 2009
  • 08:00 AM
  • 1,066 views

Life (and Death) on the Ocean Wave

by sciencebase in Sciencebase Science Blog

To predict the height of crests and the depths of troughs of ocean waves, scientists can turn to the well-known work of German mathematician and scientist Johann Carl Friedrich Gauss. The so-called Gaussian function provides a mathematical formula from which one can determine the normal distribution of wave heights based on probability theory and statistics.

Gauss [...]Post from: Sciencebase Science Blog... Read more »

Francesco Fedele. (2009) On the statistics of oceanic waves. Int. J. Reliability and Safety, 3(1/2/3), 258-266.

  • June 18, 2009
  • 09:55 AM
  • 1,114 views

Mollusks: Out of sight, out of mind, out of luck?

by Scott A. in JournOwl

If you haven’t yet heard, the Nature Conservancy recently released a report that documented a staggering decline in oyster reefs.  According to the report, “Globally, 85% of oyster reefs have been lost, making oyster reefs one of the most severely impacted marine ecosystem on the planet (Shellfish Reefs at Risk, Nature Conservancy, 2009).”

But as oysters [...]... Read more »

  • June 17, 2009
  • 11:00 AM
  • 1,234 views

Carrot Tops Healthy Veg

by David Bradley in SciScoop Science Forum

News from my Newcastle University published today reveals that cooking carrots whole and then chopping them before serving is better for your health than slicing and dicing before you boil.

Apparently, less of the “anticancer” compound falcarinol leaches out of the carrots and into the cooking water if carrots are boiled whole. Of course, the truly [...]... Read more »

  • June 17, 2009
  • 09:09 AM
  • 828 views

It's always good to know there's someone

by steffi suhr in Science behind the scenes

I was quite excited recently to receive an alert about this new paper by Nomaki et al. The authors ‘labelled’ phytoplankton – microscopic algae – with the carbon stable isotope 13C, which is easily done by adding amounts of the isotope to a batch of growing algae who will happily incorporate it into (among other things) the fatty acids they contain. The tracer can then later be detected in the algae and any organism that eats them. Nomaki et al. then fed these labelled algae to foraminifera living on the seafloor in Sagami Bay, Japan, at a water depth of 1450 m.

Building (among others) on this and this previous work with their approach, Nomaki et al. were able to show that foraminifera don’t just selectively ingest the tastiest bits of algae, they also modify certain components of it. This means that they don’t just change the availability of fresh, yummy food to other benthos by ingesting it, they also change its composition – so, even if someone eats the forams, they might not get the prime bits.

Globobulimina affinis, courtesy Dr. Hidetaka Nomaki

Even if you don’t know what foraminifera or benthic organisms are, this may still interest you because foraminifera are used as proxies for productivity in palaeoceanography, meaning that people use them to make inferences on past productivity patterns of the surface ocean. Of course, the more you know about the proxy you’re using, the better your chance of getting it right – and, considering that past surface ocean productivity can tell us about climate patterns, this is important information to have.

If I still haven’t convinced you, it’s probably because you just don’t care. But I do. Which brings me to the more personal part of this post.

We all have something we think is really interesting/important/absolutely-groundbreaking-and-will-change-the-way-we-see-things. This is one of those things for me, and it’s the kind of work I would have loved to be doing now if I was still active in science myself. Instead, I am very happy that Hidetaka is making steady progress in this area. I wouldn’t be able to compete with him anyway – when I met him at a conference three or four years ago, I seem to remember him saying that they actually have technicians at JAMSTEC who do the fatty acid analyses for them (yes, even for postdocs). No way would I have been able to work fast enough to keep up with that, especially since I had to scrub down the entire clean room every time before I could even start after some other PhD students had messed it up with filthy goo from ginormous organisms like sea cucumbers (you know who you are!!!) while – in comparison – I was trying to look at minute amounts of material {sigh}.

So, just as I am about to finally turn my back on marine science (future strange turns of fate or luck notwithstanding, and of course I’ll still pursue it as a hobby – or as a kind of female ‘gentleman scientist’) to work here, I am happy that someone is carrying the torch. Especially since Hidetaka (please forgive me for saying this, it’s only because I’m finally out that I want to say it!!) actually called me the ‘pioneer’ in this type of work :)

Going a few steps further, it would now be interesting (what am I saying: essential) to nail down the effect the uptake and degradation of fresh phytoplankton material has on the stable isotope signature of foraminiferal tests.

Please, Hidetaka?

Nomaki, H., Ohkouchi, N., Heinz, P., Suga, H., Chikaraishi, Y., Ogawa, N., Matsumoto, K., & Kitazato, H. (2009). Degradation of algal lipids by deep-sea benthic foraminifera: An in situ tracer experiment Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr.2009.04.013... Read more »

Nomaki, H., Ohkouchi, N., Heinz, P., Suga, H., Chikaraishi, Y., Ogawa, N., Matsumoto, K., & Kitazato, H. (2009) Degradation of algal lipids by deep-sea benthic foraminifera: An in situ tracer experiment. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers. DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr.2009.04.013  

  • June 14, 2009
  • 11:41 AM
  • 1,813 views

Sage advice?: NC to join 13 states in outlawing Salvia divinorum

by David J Kroll in Terra Sigillata

Salvia divinorum (Salvia, Magic Mint) is a plant used for entheogenic purposes by the Mazatec people of Mexico. A relative of the common garden plant "scarlet sage" (Salvia splendens), S. divinorum contains several hallucinogens that include salvinorin A, the first non-nitrogenous agonist known for kappa opioid receptors (KOR).

I had known of salvinorin A since a highly-cited 2002 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences paper by Bryan Roth, Richard Rothman and colleagues (full text here). At that time, I had read several anecdotal reports (that I cannot locate now) that the hallucinations rendered by Salvia ingestion or smoking were so bizarre and disturbing that 8 of 10 first-time users declared they would not use it again. Hence, I never really thought that Salvia would become much of a public health problem or be embraced by recreational hallucinogen enthusiasts.

However, just Google "Salvia" and take a gander at the ads on the right sidebar.

I'm still not certain if Salvia is enough of a public health problem to warrant legislation but we just learned this week that North Carolina will join 13 other US states in criminalizing possession and use of the plant or extracts made thereof:

A bill that would outlaw the psychoactive herb Salvia divinorum has passed the state Senate, prompting consumers to rush to buy it legally.

Senate Bill 138, sponsored by Sen. Bill Purcell, D-Laurinburg, would prohibit the "manufacture, sale, delivery, or possession" of Salvia divinorum. The law calls for a fine for the first two offenses and misdemeanor charges for subsequent offenses. Purcell stressed that North Carolina's law would not be as strict as those of 13 states, which made Salvia divinorum a drug on par with heroin. Read the rest of this post... | Read the comments on this post...... Read more »

  • June 14, 2009
  • 01:39 AM
  • 2,175 views

Is Taylor's "compromised need" pseudoscience?

by Christina Pikas in Christina's LIS Rant

If you've read my blog at all, you probably know I'm a Taylor (1962,

1968) groupie.

In fact, in a recent post

I talked about going from a visceral need to a compromised

need.  This is a central idea in library science. So when I

saw this article in my feeds today, I had to pounce on it:

Nicolaisen,

J. (in press). Compromised need and the label effect: An examination of

claims and evidence Journal

of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,

1-6 DOI: 10.1002/asi.21129

Let's look at this paper, its claims, and discuss it a bit, shall we?

As a reminder, compromised need is what comes out of the information

seeker's mouth or is typed by her hands when interfacing with an

information retrieval system (here, an information retrieval system can

have a librarian as the interface - and that librarian can be there in

person or connected via some electronic means - or can be a web search

page or research database search page, or even a book index).

 The idea is that what actually comes out might be very

different from the actual need because there are labeling problems, you

might not know what you need or how to describe what is

needed, and because you change what you say based on what interface

you've got and what you think

the system can do with your input (see for example, my comps reading

from Wolfram (2008) in which the searches were different for two

systems, with similar google boxes).

Nicolaisen starts by talking about the importance of this concept - the

compromised need - and how it wasn't really used for much until the

1980s, when researchers started to use cognitive and psychological

research in LIS.  Apparently though,  this theory has

never been validated as such and tested to see if it holds water.

 It's basically been taken at face value and reference

training for librarians has changed accordingly.  His point in

this article is to compare Taylor's claims to empirical

studies that track reference questions received to see if there is

support for "compromised need."

In describing the claims, I think Nicolaisen says some things that seem

obvious, but do not match with my experience or what I've seen

in articles on evaluating reference service in the public library. The

first of these is that this compromised thing makes sense for areas

outside of one's expertise but makes no sense for a known-item search

or someone with a "verificative need".  He says:

If the information need is

a verificative need, the inquirer is in possession of bibliographical

data, and if the information need is a conscious topical need, the

inquirer is in possession of terms and concepts necessary for

expressing the required information. However, when confronting the

intermediary, inquirers allegedly tend to specify their needs using

other terms and concepts, which mitigate or misrepresent their true

information needs. It almost seems like the inquirers deliberately pull

the wool over the eyes of the intermediaries, thus making it much

harder for them to provide the desired information.

He seems very skeptical (the way this is written) and questions how

often this happens. But actually, there are many instances when this is

indeed the case.  For example, when the information need is on

a sensitive subject or if the patron doesn't have any faith that the

information system can respond to that request.  He lists a

pile of references in which this is taken as a given, and found none in

which this idea is questioned.  Indeed, in the literature

reviews everyone apparently relies on a study by Ingwersen that

essentially had a sample size of 2 - which is ok for qualitative work,

but it's not, by definition, generalizable.

When looking through the evidence provided in the studies he

reviewed, he found that only a very small proportion of the

questions required extensive interviews and likewise very few of the

questions changed from the initial question after the reference

interview. He ends the article by describing what's needed for

induction - going from some observations to a universal statement -

including large sample size, works in different settings, no

conflicting information.  Further he calls this pseudo

scientific because it faces unresolved problems and it is accepted

without question and testing (whoa... them's fightin' words)

I think Nicolaisen's sample of literature is weak, to be honest. Many,

many public libraries have evaluated reference service and time and

again they've shown that failure to do a proper reference interview

leads to poor results.  No interview -> few questions

are answered correctly -> there is something in the interview

process that allows the system to make a better match with the need

than without it. The patron could have perfectly specified the need -

but if it is not understood by the system, then they won't get the

answer.  How about studies of search engine logs?

 Clearly the needs are imperfectly specified because the

system returns documents matching the terms, and yet the user enters a

new search.

 I was one of the student investigators on a study by Kaske

and Arnold of virtual reference services.  We did a typical

Hernon and McClure study and it was the same old thing - librarians who

asked what we needed and checked back to see if what they gave us was

appropriate were the only ones who successfully answered the question.

 It's not that we weren't saying what we needed, it's that it

couldn't be interpreted correctly most of the time in isolation. Just

because interviews were not performed does not mean that the questions

did not require an interview! It is often the case that someone will

come in for a specific book, but really have a much bigger problem, and

that you can only address this bigger issue through an interview.

Of course my experience and the myriad studies in the state of Maryland

do not contradict what Nicolaisen found in the studies he looked at;

however, I think he picked the wrong studies. He was only looking for

studies that specifically looked at before and after statements of

information need. It's not that it's not studied and questioned so it's

pseudoscience, it's that it is part of all of the studies that we do in

certain areas of our field.  

My arguments are somewhat confused, but basically:

1) studies showing importance of reference interviews to answering

patrons' questions are relevant to this topic

2) reports that interviews aren't required do not say if/how the

patron's actual problems were solved or if the patrons were satisfied

with the service

3) people put 2-3 words into a search engine - that's it - there's no

way that can perfectly specify their information need

And I'm going to stop writing now, as I stopped saying anything new a

while ago!

Taylor,

R. S. (1962). Process of asking questions. American

Documentation, 13(4), 391-396.

Taylor, R. S. (1968).

Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries.

College & Research Libraries, 29(3),

178-194.

Wolfram,

D. (2008). Search characteristics in

different types of Web-based IR environments:

are they the same? Information Processing &

Management, 44,

1279-1292

Read the comments on this post...... Read more »

Nicolaisen, J. (2009) Compromised need and the label effect: An examination of claims and evidence. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 1-6. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21129  

  • June 11, 2009
  • 06:43 PM
  • 1,422 views

Risk Management: Contingent versus Mitigative

by Jan Husdal in husdal.com

The risk management literature separates between mitigative actions or strategies and contingent actions and strategies. It is important to keep these two perspectives apart. Why? Because risk management needs to address both sides of the risk: what lies behind the risk (source) and what lies in front of it (consequences). Here is my attempt at [...]... Read more »

  • June 10, 2009
  • 10:01 AM
  • 1,356 views

The incredible shrinking reef fish

by Scott A. in JournOwl

They say a picture is worth a thousand words and in the case of Loren McClenachan’s June 2009 publication in The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology there is evidence of a major decline in the size of fish caught in the Florida Keys.  McClenachan used a unique method for quantitating the changes of [...]... Read more »

  • June 8, 2009
  • 10:00 AM
  • 1,366 views

Sea-cage pathogen factory: Salmon and Sea Lice

by Scott A. in JournOwl

I wish I could remember the exact quote and context, but I was intrigued by the sheer  denial of a salmon farmer’s claim that the aquacultured fish were not endangering wild stocks.  I guess the preservation of the business drives the  denunciation but there has been many peer-reviewed publications over the years presenting evidence that [...]... Read more »

  • June 5, 2009
  • 08:00 AM
  • 966 views

Can Death be Sustainable?

by sciencebase in Sciencebase Science Blog

A case study

Few people like to dwell on the subject of death, but it’s up there alongside taxes with life’s inevitabilities. But, consider it we must, for the sake of the environment.

At some point in our primordial past the dead were left to the scavenging dogs, the vultures, the flies, and the microbes. There were [...]Post from: Sciencebase Science Blog... Read more »

Eva Collins, Kate Kearins, & Helen Tregidga. (2009) Exiting in a State of Grace: can death be sustainable?. Int. J. Sustainable Strategic Management, 1(3), 258-284.

  • June 4, 2009
  • 12:00 AM
  • 1,233 views

Guest Post: Shark toothed theropods in Asia – introducing Shaochilong

by Dave Hone in Archosaur Musings

I may be headding off to sunny Inner Mongolia, but have left the keys to the Musings behind in the hands of theropod specialist and memeber of the worldwide Bristol mafia, Steve Brusatte to talk to you about a new paper (and a new taxon) we have described with our colleagues (though I honestly and [...]... Read more »

  • June 2, 2009
  • 04:58 PM
  • 1,412 views

Plagiarism... what can be done? simply suffer it?

by Pablo Artal in Optics confidential

Some comments on the impact of plagiarism on science. How affect scientists; what can we do as scientists and more... (ah! and some recommendations on restaurants too).... Read more »

P.Artal, S. Marcos, R. Navarro, D. R. Williams. (1995) Odd aberrations and double-pass measurements of retinal image quality. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 195.

  • June 1, 2009
  • 10:00 AM
  • 833 views

Towards Hydrogen Storage in Hydrazine Borane

by Michael Long in Phased

Dieter Lentz (Freie Universitat Berlin) and coworkers

have made progress towards applying hydrazine borane as a

highly effective hydrogen storage medium.

This news feature was written on June 1, 2009.... Read more »

Hügle, T., Kühnel, M. F., & Lentz, D. (2009) Hydrazine Borane: A Promising Hydrogen Storage Material. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 131(21), 7444-7446. DOI: 10.1021/ja9013437  

  • May 28, 2009
  • 01:30 PM
  • 944 views

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY: Vying for the Future of Bio-Powered Transport

by Michael Long in Phased

Elliott Campbell (University of California, Merced)

and coworkers have found that electricity from biomass is

more ideal for use in battery-powered vehicles than internal

combustion engines, when evaluating the issue solely

from a land-use perspective.

This news feature was written on May 28, 2009.... Read more »

  • May 27, 2009
  • 10:23 AM
  • 1,120 views

Free drugs: Just say no?

by zayzayem in It's Alive!!

“Everybody likes something free.” I don’t think anyone is going to disagree with Chimonas and Kassirer there.

Drugs are expensive. And even if in a country like Australia, universal insurance may mean that vital medicines are cheap for the end-consumer, somewhere someone has pay the full price (i.e. the government).

Because drugs are so expensive, many [...]... Read more »

Chimonas, S., & Kassirer, J. (2009) No More Free Drug Samples?. PLoS Medicine, 6(5). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000074  

  • May 19, 2009
  • 04:08 PM
  • 687 views

Meet Ida!

by The Science Pundit in The Science Pundit

Meet Ida! a.k.a. Darwinius masillae. Ida is a 47 million year old fossil primate that was discovered in the Eocene fossil beds in Messel Germany. Ida was 24 cm. (~10 in.) from head to tail, meaning that--by some estimates--she probably weighed a little over a pound. In the picture below you can see the whole skeleton. It is fairly rare to find complete Eocene mammal skeletons--particularly primates. You can read online research paper about Ida here.And Ida is just wonderful! On the downside, her skull was crushed, but on the upside, you can actually see where her fur was! (click on picture to embiggenize) Kewl!!!You might have noticed that Ida kind of looks like a lemur. But there are morphological traits there that put her into the Cercamoniinae, from which modern anthropoids (monkeys and apes) evolved. In other words, we have ourselves a complete transitional primate fossil. This is super exciting! Another thing we know abot Ida is that she was a juvenile. How do we know that, you ask? Check out her teeth!You can clearly see that she has a mix of fully developed and developing teeth. For example, the M1 molars above are developed and in place but the M2 molars are still moving and the M3 molars probably haven't broken through the gums yet. We can compare this pattern to the dental development of similarly sized modern primates to estimate that Ida was about 80% of the way to full maturity when she died. And as I said before, there's much more in the paper.Yay for science!Franzen, J., Gingerich, P., Habersetzer, J., Hurum, J., von Koenigswald, W., & Smith, B. (2009). Complete Primate Skeleton from the Middle Eocene of Messel in Germany: Morphology and Paleobiology PLoS ONE, 4 (5) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005723... Read more »

  • May 19, 2009
  • 03:26 PM
  • 921 views

IS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DIVIDING ABORIGINAL PEOPLE? CAN IT STOP?

by Christopher Leo in Christopher Leo

I'll be at the Canadian Political Science Association conference in Ottawa next week delivering a paper originally entitled "Building cohesion, aggravating division", with an even more obscure, academic-sounding subtitle. But I've changed the title and the new one is the one I'm using for this blog entry. My article grows out of studies I did recently in Winnipeg of aboriginal policy and policy regarding immigration and settlement. Originally, these studies had nothing to do with each other, but when they were finished, I was struck by the contrast between them.... Read more »

Christopher Leo. (2006) Deep Federalism: Respecting Community Difference in National Policy. Canadian Journal of Political Science 39:3, 2006, 481-506., 39(3), 481-506.

  • May 17, 2009
  • 02:50 PM
  • 1,492 views

Open Source Psychic

by Bryan Perkins in Science. Why not?

As I was reading the post about open access science in which Bora over at A Blog Around the Clock mentions the research paper I posted on this blog, I found one line in particular that expresses the importance of Open Access science in my mind. In the article Bora says:
"In any case, it is much better for data to be out in the open, available to anyone who knows how to use Google search, than gathering dust in some manila folder."... Read more »

MacCallum, C., & Parthasarathy, H. (2006) Open Access Increases Citation Rate. PLoS Biology, 4(5). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040176  

  • May 16, 2009
  • 05:25 PM
  • 1,193 views

Finding the right location – minimizing disruption costs

by Jan Husdal in husdal.com

Classical facility location models assume that once optimally located and set up, facilities will operate as planned, smoothly, and without interruption. In reality, though, operations seldom go as planned; interruptions, unscheduled downtime and failures occur every once in a while, with unplanned and unbudgeted disruption costs as a consequence. Is it possible to know beforehand which locations that have the least disuptions costs?... Read more »

join us!

Do you write about peer-reviewed research in your blog? Use ResearchBlogging.org to make it easy for your readers — and others from around the world — to find your serious posts about academic research.

If you don't have a blog, you can still use our site to learn about fascinating developments in cutting-edge research from around the world.

Register Now

Research Blogging is powered by SMG Technology.

To learn more, visit seedmediagroup.com.